Connect with us


CBI- Crook Review



The Bank of Namibia has been ordered by a court to fund CBI Global.   

The Bank of Namibia is the country’s primary financial regulator. CBI Global is a deceptive Ponzi scheme.   

The BoN froze Botha’s assets in March as part of their efforts to shut down CBI Global, which is run by serial Ponzi scammer Coenie Botha (below).   

This included CBI Global, which is incorporated in Namibia as CBI Exchange. The assets in question were primarily stolen CBI Global investor funds held in accounts at Bank Windhoek.   

Botha attempted to thwart regulation of his Ponzi scheme by suing BoN, arguing that he had a legal right to defraud people.  Botha obtained the right to claim operational expenses from frozen funds as part of those proceedings.  Botha filed claims totaling more than $62,150, the majority of which would be laundered through Afrika Jantjies’ law firm. 

Afrika Jantjies (right) was introduced to CBI Global investors.  

He claimed to be CBI Global’s attorney and Compliance Officer.   

“We are the CBI attorneys. In addition, I serve as the compliance officer for CBI Exchange Namibia. If anything is done illegally or in violation of the law, it is my responsibility to advise my client to desist, stop, and comply.  Rather than doing so, Jantjies’ role quickly changed to accomplice after learning CBI Global was a Ponzi scheme.”   

Botha’s exorbitant expenses were objected to by BoN.   

“Legal fees are not only not considered necessary day-to-day expenses, but they also appear to be excessive. When combined with the retainer, it means that the entire month is dedicated solely to (CBI Global’s) legal work. If one assumes a combined hourly fee of N$5000 for Mr. Jantjies and instructed counsel for April 2022, it would mean that they both spent approximately 6 hours per day from Monday to Friday on (CBI Global’s) legal work for the entire month of April 2022 (including the holidays). It is also worth noting that among the expenses is the “third and final remaining retainer… in respect of the VASP application to FIC.” This is a request to the Financial Intelligence Center.”   

I asked the FIC how much such a registration would cost. Mr. Kristian Hamutenya, the FIC’s Deputy Director of Compliance who handles these applications, has informed me that no registration fee is required. He stated that the process is so simple that small estate agencies, churches, second-hand goods retailers, and other non-profit organizations have been able to register without the help of a consultant.

As a result, there was no need for the application to appoint a consultant, especially at a cost of N $559,574.40. That expense cannot be justified as a necessary day-to-day business expense.   

CBI Global pushed the case through the courts, which led to the High Court of Namibia’s decision on July 7th.   

Despite the obvious attempt to launder stolen investor funds and avoid attempts to regulate CBI Global, the court chose to ignore the situation.   

The (Bank of Namibia and Bank Windhoek Limited) must… release payments and funds from (CBI Global’s) bank account that are required for (CBI Global’s) day-to-day operations. The (Bank of Namibia and Bank Windhoek Limited) must… pay the cost of (CBI Global). The matter has been resolved and removed from the roll.   

The Bank of Namibia’s evidence of inflated and unnecessary claimed expenses was dismissed.   

The court stated that it cannot issue an interdict preventing (the Bank of Namibia and Bank Windhoek Limited) from imposing reasonable conditions for the release of payments, conditions in this case requiring (CBI Global) to substantiate the expenses with the necessary documents.  

The court effectively barred the Bank of Namibia, Namibia’s top financial regulator, from questioning CBI Global’s claimed expenses.   

If that sounds ridiculous, it’s because it is.   

The main issue in this case, in my opinion, is that the court did not recognize the basis for the asset freeze.   

“(CBI Global) claims that it is suffering greatly both operationally and financially.    To mitigate the devastating effect of a total freeze on the applicant’s account, this court granted an order authorizing the payment of necessary day-to-day business expenses while the Bank of Namibia’s investigation continues. (CBI Global) asserts that it requires its day-to-day expenses in order to continue operating and existing pending the resolution of the parties’ dispute. (CBI Global) further contends that if an urgent hearing is denied, it will be denied the right to have its necessary day-to-day expenses released and, as a result, will be unable to survive financially. CBI Global continues to suffer irreparable financial and operational harm as a result of the Bank of Namibia and Bank Windhoek Limited’s illegal interference.”   

The court is treating CBI Global as a legitimate business. It is not; it is a clear Ponzi scheme that has now failed four times.   

I understand that the BoN’s regulatory case against CBI Global is still ongoing, but allowing a Ponzi scheme to further launder stolen investor funds, with the assistance of an attorney no less, is heinous.   

Unsurprisingly, the Bank of Namibia has filed an appeal against the High Court’s decision. On the same day as the High Court’s decision, an appeal was filed with the Supreme Court of Namibia.   

Unfortunately, the Namibian High Court’s decision is just the most recent example of African regulators’ failing to combat MLM-related securities fraud.   

We have the Mirror Trading International saga in South Africa. Clynton and Cheri Marks (right), suspected owners of the $1.7 billion dollar Ponzi scheme, have been and continue to be ignored by South African authorities.   

The Marks crime family is still on the loose in South Africa. For nearly two years, they have been free to launder stolen MTI investor funds.   

Then there’s Cameroon’s Liyeplimal Ponzi scheme, run by Emile Simb.    Cameroonian authorities arrested Simb in late May after ignoring Liyeplimal for two years, despite multiple securities fraud warnings across Africa.   

Simb was released by a court, prompting him to flee the country. Simb is suspected of fleeing on a diplomatic passport issued by the neighboring Central African Republic with the assistance of Cameroonian government officials.   

Simb is still at large.   

This depressingly illuminating insight reveals just how difficult authorities face in combating MLM-related securities fraud in Namibia, South Africa, and Cameroon.   

Even if authorities take action (a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence), as we’ve seen in Cameroon and now Namibia, African courts actively work against authorities to vindicate and eventually free scammers.   

Namibian authorities continue to turn a blind eye to Coenie Botha’s fraud to the extent that running Ponzi schemes carries any criminal liability in Namibia.   

Stay tuned for a decision on the Bank of Namibia’s Supreme Court appeal…

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Meta Utopia- Crook Review




A few days ago, we put out its review of Meta Utopia.

“Metaverse” MLM crypto Ponzi scheme that isn’t very interesting on its own.

As part of our research, we found a link between Nicholas Coppola and the man who started the Ponzi scheme.

Or rather, he did it through an Instagram story that has since been deleted:

Coppola wasn’t happy about being linked to Meta Utopia in public, it turns out. He only wants to hide the fact that he is a crypto-bro Ponzi scammer.

Today, Nicholas Coppola joins the DMCA Wall of Shame.

Over the past 24 hours, “Dincer Odabasi” from “Copyright Support” has sent us two emails. Nicholas Coppola’s emails were sent on his behalf.

Copyright Support says on its poorly made website that it will

Negative or damaging news that can be found on the Internet and in Google search results should be taken down for good.

In his first email, Odabasi tries to pull the old “right to be forgotten” scam.

“Dear Madam,

Because of the right to be forgotten and because of the privacy clause, we want the content to be blocked.

We tried to get in touch with the website that posted the content, but we didn’t hear back. So, we give you the content and ask you to turn it off.

As everyone knows, according to the first paragraph of Article 9 of Law No. 5651 on the Regulation of Broadcasts Made on the Internet and Combating Crimes Committed Through These Broadcasts, if they can’t get to it, they can send a warning to the hosting provider and ask that the content be taken down.

Again, the second paragraph of the same article says that “the content and/or hosting provider must respond to requests from people who say their personal rights have been violated by the content of an online broadcast within twenty-four hours at the latest.”

We want the case that was filed on our behalf to be taken care of. Because of the European right to be forgotten and the privacy of private life, we have the right to limit access to content.

Please note that we’re asking you to take down the content because we’ve tried to reach the owner but haven’t heard back. That’s why we want and need you to take it down.”

This is a form letter that con artists send out. I know that because Odabasi put the same notice to Amazon from another email about a different website and client (ruhroh GDPR fail) into the body of the email he sent me.

In any case, the “Right to be Forgotten” law in Europe is used by scammers to hide their pasts, no matter how good the lawmakers’ intentions may have been at first.

The Right to be Forgotten is not part of EU law, so we don’t recognise it. Also, it takes four days from the date of publication until a right-to-be-forgotten takedown notice is sent.

Odabasi went on to say that Turkish law had something to do with the US, which was not true.

Due to the Right to be Forgotten and the USA Legal Content Removal Request Pursuant to Law No. 5651, we can’t take down the content we told you about because it’s in the Constitution.

“The Right to be Forgotten and the USA Legal Content Removal Request” is not a thing, even if that sentence makes no sense. It’s not true at all.

Turkey passed Law No. 5651 in the year 2020. It only happens in Turkey and has nothing to do with the United States.

Odabasi sent another email a few hours after the first one. This time, he threatened to take action because of copyright issues.

“We want you to remove any content that reveals personal information about our representative.

If you don’t get rid of the news content, we will file a copyright claim with your hosting company, Google.

I’d like you to put the story away, please.


As our Policy says, we often use “third-party logos and images,” which is allowed by US copyright law through “fair use.”

We don’t need permission from the people who own the rights to the images we use in our MLM news and reviews. Period. 

The DMCA takedown process is being abused when fair use isn’t taken into account and a fake DMCA is filed. Not only will it not work, but the person who submitted it is lying.

Even though it’s clear that Copyright Support doesn’t care about the law, it’s still important to point out their hypocrisy.

Scam businesses like Copyright Support depend on the fact that the publisher or service provider they are after doesn’t know what they are doing.

Nicholas Coppola has publicly linked himself to Meta Utopia and is involved enough to be close to the Ponzi scheme’s founder, who has not yet been named.

It is not against any US law to publish this information with proof attached.

Update, July 2, 2022: Dincer Odabasi is now committing twice as much DMCA fraud as he was before.

Odabasi sent Google a “court order” on June 28 that says the same thing: “It’s against the law to search for scammers!” Stupid, but it also says this:

Based on the privacy clause of private life and the court document we will send you, we want the content to be taken down from publication and blocked from access.”

Odabasi is saying that a Turkish law is a “court document” that keeps scammers from telling the rest of the world. Oh dear.

Continue Reading


Laetitude- Crook Review




Investors such as Laetitutde and Swapoo are circumspect on issues affecting investor wallets and active investments. 

According to a Latitude News report dated August 13th, You have gotten one or two emails from Swapoo in the past several days, which also affects our Laetitude members. 

Due to the continued strong relationship between Swapoo and Laetitude, we can guarantee that these changes will not affect your Laetitude accounts. Latitude will continue to operate as usual.   

The alterations made by Swapoo will have an effect on the wallet and the bots. However, we are aware that wherever there are obstacles and closed doors, new doors will emerge to provide opportunities for greater success. 

Swapoo is merely adjusting to the ever-changing regulatory environment and market situations.

The details of the e-mails sent are kept confidential. I have not encountered any examples in nature. 

Regarding “evolving regulatory landscapes,” Laetitude is a Ponzi scheme operated by Swapoo. 

David El Dib operates Laetitude from Dubai, the center of MLM fraud. Swapoo is run by Dave Martin, who is from the Philippines.El Dib and Martin have both established themselves on the BitClub Network. 

The investigation by the Department of Justice found BitClub Network to be a $722 million Ponzi scheme. The founders of BitClub Network were arrested in 2019. 

El Dib and Martin commit securities fraud and operate their own Ponzi scheme through Laetitude and Swapoo. The regulation of securities is not novel. For decades, every nation with a financial market has regulated securities fraud. 

The Ponzi fraud announced a remedy for lost Swapoo wallets in a follow-up “Laetitude News” post dated August 26;  

As you are likely aware, Laetitude no longer utilizes Swapoo for secure wallet services. As a result, we have recently implemented the ability to fund, purchase, and withdraw directly within Laetitude. 

In light of this, we would like to encourage you to login and withdraw your balance as soon as possible, and to continue withdrawing your balance as your compensation earnings increase. 

Laetitude lacks the two-factor authentication security offered by Swapoo, so it is essential that you protect your account with a formidable password. Again, what is occurring behind the scenes is kept secret. 

The only clue I could locate was a query posted two weeks ago on Swapoo’s most recent Instagram post. 

Swapoo has not published any new social media updates since July 30. This date also marked the last Facebook update posted by Laetitude. 

The lack of visitors to both Laetitude and Swapoo suggests that the Ponzi scheme is running out of money to pay investment withdrawals. 

The Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission is one of the most active securities regulators worldwide.

It is unclear whether they have anything to do with Swapoo’s issues.  

Whatever else is occurring, it is rare for wallets to be abruptly shut off and placed up as unsecured in-house assets. 

Keep up to date on any future developments.

Continue Reading


GSPartners- Crook Review




GSPartners has dropped its claim of harassment against Chris Saunders. Saunders is the owner and operator of the YouTube channel Grit Grind Gold, which he uses to critique and report on the GSPartners Ponzi scheme. 

In late January 2021, Saunders was sued for harassment by owner Josip Heit and promoters Michael Dalcoe and Antonio (Tony) Euclides Menesis De Gouveia. 

Heit and the GSPartners Plaintiffs alleged that Sunders’ videos about the Ponzi scheme were defamatory. 

Additionally, Heit took offense when Saunders pointed out his position in Karatbars International’s collapsed KBC Ponzi scheme.  

GSB Gold Standard Corporation AG, Josip Heit, Michael Dalcoe, and Tony De Gouveia submitted a dismissal stipulation on July 29.  

Christopher Saunders, the defendant, executed a declaration in connection with the aforementioned case on July 29, 2022. 

Plaintiffs GSB Gold Standard Corporation AG, Josip Heit, Antonio Euclides Menesis De Gouveia, and Michael Dalcoe, by counsel and with the signature and agreement of counsel for Defendant Christopher Saunders, stipulate to the dismissal without prejudice of all claims in this matter pursuant to the Saunders’ Declaration.

The aforementioned stipulation from Saunders proves that he was granted permission. 

Mr. Ovidu Toma in relation to the Plaintiffs’ assertions and declarations. Since January 2020, Mr. Ovidu Toma has provided me with evidence of Mr. Harald Seiz’s alleged involvement in Karatbars’ wrongful conduct.   

“Ovidu Toma” refers to Ovidiu Toma, the former Chief Technology Officer of Karatbars International. 

Today, Toma serves as the CEO of CryptoData. Romania-based CryptoData sells encryption hardware. 

To return to Saunder’s assertion: I was aware, based on first-hand knowledge of facts and documents, that any alleged wrongdoing committed by Karatbars in relation to its Miami crypto bank and the issuance of KBC/KBC tokens was committed by Karatbars’ CEO, Mr. Harald Seiz, and that said wrongdoing was committed prior to any affiliation between Karatbars and GSB/Mr. Heit.

This is an odd concession to provide. Heit was the public face of Karatbars’ initial excursion into crypto-asset fraud. In an April 2019 interview, Seiz is referred to as a “major investor and board member” of Karatbars International. In Dubai, Karatbars was selling a “blockchain phone” at the time. When challenged about his remarks on the occasion, he responded, and I quote, ” You mentioned the KBC coin.

You stated that it is probable that it is one kilogram of gold. Is this truly a possibility? Heit reacted. Yes, of course it’s feasible. Nobody believes that many individuals perceive, at the appropriate moment, that they can join us.  

We currently have a market valuation of approximately $300 million as of the previous week or two weeks. And now there are about a billion of us.   

Is it not yet understood?  

And when the mainnet is implemented, which will occur very soon, within a few months we will have a market capitalization of over $200 billion. After months of Heit and Seiz promoting Karatbars’ KBC, the KBC Ponzi coin dropped 62% following the hype event on July 4, 2019. 

Heit, not Harald Seiz, was sent to address and explain the collapse to irate investors. KBC continued to leak throughout the subsequent months until it was eventually abandoned.

Heit had cashed out, left Karatbars, and launched his own Ponzi offshoot, GSPartners, before the end of 2019. The GSPartners Ponzi coins have performed no better than those of KBC.

G999 is supported by wash trading, which I believe is steadily depleting GSPartners’ second Ponzi scheme, LYS. G999 is being washed at approximately 0.002413. At $66.78, LYS continues to drain. 

GEUR was launched earlier this month as a result of the continuous failure of G999 and LYS to take off. GSPartners and Heit symbolize the euro-pegged GEUR currency. It is thought that GEUR was developed because GSPartners investors no longer desired to hold G999 and LYS. 

GEUR does not exist outside of GSPartners as of the publication date. GSPartners uses GEUR to support its most recent 300% ROI Ponzi scheme, metaverse certificates. 

In the event that GSPartners and Saunders achieved a settlement, it has not been made public. Other than wrongly saying that Heit was not involved in the Karatbars KBC scam, Saunders has not recanted any of his GSPartners-related statements.  

The court authorized the GSPartners plaintiff’s Stipulation of Dismissal on August 2nd. This concludes GSPartner’s harassment lawsuit against Saunders.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2022 CrooksDirectory.